In-depth coverage of the latest IP & Copyright developments, trends, and analysis — curated daily.
Why fight IP battles to the bitter end when smart settlements can reboot your business overnight? These five strategies turn defense into dollars, proving litigation's a sucker's bet.
AI isn't just automating jobs—it's bottling lightning, capturing the 'feel' of expertise that once vanished with quitting employees. David Teece reveals how this flips intellectual capital from fleeting human minds to ironclad company assets.
BlackBerry's going private. But is this the death knell or a sly pivot to patent power? Once a mobile king, it's now fighting for relevance in a touchscreen world.
Picture this: You're in a stuffy conference room at the USPTO, fresh off Gary Locke's speech, microphone in hand for an exclusive chat. He doesn't know yet—but in six hours, Obama's tapping him for Beijing. Patent reform hangs in the balance, and Locke's spilling the real story.
You think the lightbulb guy is the inventor? Wrong. Patent law demands more than a eureka moment—it's a brutal conception test. Buckle up for the truth.
What if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's bloated backlog vanished overnight? It's happening—inventory below 2,000 for the first time in two decades, and it's not all good news.
Picture Capitol Hill staffers scribbling notes as a vet warns: our patent system's cracking. Bayh-Dole saved us once—will Trump let it die?
Everyone figured it'd be another hour of platitudes from corporate IP suits. But these leaders from the 'Top 100 Most Innovative Companies' dropped some raw truths on patents, secrecy, and who really wins in the innovation game.
What if the USPTO just fixed patent eligibility on its own? Andrei Iancu thinks they have—with guidance that's turning the corner on Alice chaos. Courts, your move.
In a quiet USPTO office, examiners got a memo that could save software patents from Alice's shadow. It's a lifeline for coders dreaming big.
You're unemployed, idea burning a hole in your pocket, and some outfit offers patents for peanuts. Sounds like a steal—until it drives off a cliff like a Yugo.
Imagine filing a patent and knowing exactly how examiners will judge if it's truly inventive. The EPO's problem-solution method promises that clarity; should the USPTO steal it? For everyday inventors, this could mean fewer rejections, or just more bureaucracy.