In-depth coverage of the latest IP & Copyright developments, trends, and analysis — curated daily.
Everyone's watching for the Supreme Court to revisit Section 101 patent eligibility. But the real seismic shifts might be happening elsewhere on the docket.
The Federal Circuit is sitting on a pile of patent petitions. Six, to be exact. This unusual concentration hints at potential shifts in doctrine.
The reign of Inter Partes Review (IPR) as the go-to for challenging U.S. patents is over. New data reveals a dramatic pivot toward Ex Parte Reexamination.
Turns out, geopolitical drama plays a role in patent licensing. An English court just set a $392 million FRAND rate, but sanctions complicated the calculation.
The European Union now finds itself under a spotlight from the U.S. Trade Representative, flagged for intellectual property concerns. This comes as a report reveals a seven-fold surge in battery recycling patents and Google mounts a significant legal challenge.
The world of IP law isn't just evolving; it's undergoing a seismic shift. Forget playing defense; the future is all about proactive strategy and deep technical understanding.
So, what does a Federal Circuit ruling on digital communication patents really mean for your average person trying to use their phone or, you know, make money in tech? It means the lawyers just got a new weapon, and the patent trolls might have to get a lot more specific.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board thought it had Zaxcom's award-winning wireless microphone tech dead to rights. It was wrong. Now, the fight's going federal.
Taylor Swift is going full legal war on AI copycats. She's filing trademarks for her voice and likeness. It's a bold move, but will it actually stick?
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 dramatically altered the landscape of trade secret litigation by establishing federal jurisdiction. While promising greater efficiency, it also introduces new strategic considerations and potential pitfalls for businesses.
When a patent judge, a seasoned veteran, cries foul on claim construction, it's worth stopping to listen. Judge Pauline Newman's dissent in a recent CAFC decision over Ford's fuel system patents isn't just a footnote; it's a potential canary in the coal mine for how patent law is being interpreted.
Imagine generating a video that mimics a blockbuster scene for pennies. That's the reality sparking a furious backlash from Hollywood and Capitol Hill.