AI Act Governance: Commission's Endless To-Do List
The EU's AI Act promises ironclad governance. Novelli's crew reveals it's more wishlist than blueprint.
For twenty years, I've seen Silicon Valley chase shiny objects. Now, a legal expert is calling out patent policy for doing the same, clinging to outdated narratives while real innovation goes misunderstood.
The EU's AI Act promises ironclad governance. Novelli's crew reveals it's more wishlist than blueprint.
Tens of thousands of Americans' tax secrets spilled by the IRS. A coalition led by CDT is now arm-twisting Congress to fight back in court.
Brussels bureaucrats aren't sleeping easy. The EU AI Act dumps 88 responsibilities on Member States, with deadlines kicking in as early as February 2025—exposing cracks in Europe's unified AI vision.
Tech execs thought selling surveillance gear to dictators was just business. EFF's Supreme Court brief says nope—Cisco's on the hook for China's Falun Gong crackdown.
Think warrants on Americans' FISA 702 data would leave spies in the dark? Hard stats say otherwise. Here's the myth-busting breakdown.
A $15.2 million verdict without blood or scalpels? Geiger Legal did it with AI smarts. Here's the playbook.
As deepfake technology proliferates, governments worldwide are racing to establish legal frameworks that balance free expression with protection against synthetic media harms.
Navigating cross-border data transfers requires understanding a complex web of legal mechanisms, each with distinct requirements, limitations, and compliance obligations.
Synthetic data is often positioned as a privacy-preserving solution, but its legal status under data protection laws is more nuanced than many organizations realize.
Natural language processing is revolutionizing legal research, moving beyond simple keyword matching to enable semantic understanding of case law, statutes, and legal arguments.
Courts and patent offices worldwide are grappling with a fundamental question: can an artificial intelligence system be legally recognized as the inventor of a patentable innovation?
As AI systems make increasingly consequential decisions about people's lives, the legal right to understand why an algorithm reached a particular outcome is becoming a cornerstone of AI regulation.