The perpetual dance between patent holders and alleged infringers just got a new twist. A recent judicial decision muddies the waters on whether patent trolls can actually get injunctions, and frankly, it's about time someone took a hard look at the money behind it all.
Another law firm is out there looking for patent attorneys. Bayes PLLC, a DC-area outfit, claims they offer more than just billable hours.
The legal industry's patent departments have been notoriously slow to adapt to the AI revolution. Now, a major law firm is making a significant move, signaling a palpable shift in the market.
For sixteen years, Section 101 has been the bane of AI patent applicants. But new data analyzing millions of rejections shows a complex reality, and it's not what you might think.
Imagine pouring years into an AI invention, only for giants to copy it freely. Paul Michel's 35-year view shows why patents failed — and how Congress might save them.
Picture Matthew McConaughey's drawl deciding your patent's fate: 'Alright, alright, alright.' USPTO just emailed that as an official April Fool's gag — and it's genius.
Imagine inventing the next big thing, only for giants to swipe it free. Patent monetization has tanked 60% since 2010 — but AI's crashing the party as the ultimate fixer.
Courts and patent offices worldwide are grappling with a fundamental question: can an artificial intelligence system be legally recognized as the inventor of a patentable innovation?