What does the Alice ruling mean for software patents?

The Alice v. CLS Bank decision significantly raised the bar for software patent eligibility, requiring claims to demonstrate more than just an abstract idea implemented on a generic computer. Many previously patentable inventions now face stricter scrutiny.

Will this make it harder to get a software patent?

Yes, generally it has become more challenging and expensive to obtain software patents since the Alice ruling. Applicants need to more clearly articulate the specific technological advancements and avoid claims that are purely abstract.

Can I still patent software?

You can still patent software, but the focus needs to be on the specific technological contribution and innovation, rather than just the functional steps of the software itself. Demonstrating a concrete improvement or a novel technical solution is key.

©️ IP & Copyright

Software Patents: Did the Courts Just Declare Code a 'Trivial Process'?

The world of software patents is in upheaval, and the core of the debate hinges on a startling question: is writing code actually 'trivial'? Professor Mark Lemley unpacks the Alice v. CLS Bank decision and its seismic impact.

Legal AI Beat Apr 12, 2026 5 min read

A stylized graphic representing lines of code transforming into a complex legal document.

⚡ Key Takeaways

The Alice v. CLS Bank decision has created a significantly more challenging environment for software patent applicants. 𝕏
A key issue is the perception, potentially held by some judges, that writing software code is a 'trivial process' lacking technological contribution. 𝕏
To succeed, software patent applications must now strongly emphasize the specific technological advancements and innovations, moving beyond abstract descriptions. 𝕏