What is the Thaler v. Perlmutter case about?

Dr. Thaler's fight to copyright AI-generated art from his Creativity Machine, rejected by Copyright Office for lacking human authorship.

Can AI-generated art be copyrighted right now?

Not if fully autonomous—needs significant human input, per current rulings. Assisted works? Often yes.

Will the Supreme Court decide AI authorship?

Likely, if D.C. Circuit denies rehearing. Experts see it heading there.

©️ IP & Copyright

Thaler's Desperate Bid to Make AI an Author: D.C. Circuit Rehearing Could Rewrite Copyright Rules

Everyone figured courts would slam the door on AI authorship. Thaler's en banc push flips the script, demanding copyrights for machine-made art—and it might just crack open the vault.

theAIcatchup Apr 09, 2026 4 min read

AI-generated artwork 'A Recent Entrance to Paradise' created by Thaler's Creativity Machine

⚡ Key Takeaways

Thaler's petition challenges human-only authorship, comparing AI to corporations. 𝕏
En banc rehearing could clarify AI-generated vs. AI-assisted works. 𝕏
Supreme Court appeal looms, potentially redefining copyright for machines. 𝕏

Published by

theAIcatchup

Where law meets technology.

#AI authorship #AI copyright #D.C. Circuit rehearing #Thaler v Perlmutter #generative AI art

Worth sharing?

Get the best Legal Tech stories of the week in your inbox — no noise, no spam.

Originally reported by IPWatchdog

⚡ Key Takeaways

The 60-Second TL;DR

theAIcatchup

Share this article

Worth sharing?

Related Stories

DOJ Draws Hard Line: No Copyright for Pure AI Creations

23 Human Rights Groups Pile Into Anthropic's IP War With Dow Chemical

Examiners' Secret Weapon: 25% of Patent Rejections Cite Invisible Prior Art

Federal Circuit's Nexus Ratchet Meets Its Match: Printed Matter's Symmetry Test

Stay in the loop