AI Daily Briefing
- Unjust Enrichment Damages Back in Play for Trade Secret Cases: What It Means for Real People: The Federal Circuit just handed down a decision that could fundamentally alter how victims of trade secret theft pursue damages. Forget the idea that you’re automatically limited to a simple royalty rate; unjust enrichment is back on the table.
- What to Watch This Week: AI’s Legal Earthquake Continues: This week’s Legal AI Beat reveals a legal world being reshaped by artificial intelligence. Next week, expect increased scrutiny on AI’s impact on junior lawyers, intensified focus on USPTO patent policies, and significant attention on the ripple effects of OpenAI’s potential IPO on legal tech.
- Daily Briefing: May 31, 2026: Your AI morning briefing for May 31, 2026 — the top stories you need to know.
- NO FAKES Act 2.0: Congress Tries Again on AI Likeness Rights: Congress is giving the ‘NO FAKES Act’ another go. This bill wants to give you ownership of your voice and face. Seriously.
- §101 Data Error: Patent Rejections Still a Mess: Forget the supposed calm. A recent data correction shows patent rejections for Section 101 are far more volatile than previously thought. This isn’t just numbers; it’s a headache for anyone trying to patent something.
- Court Reinstates Unjust Enrichment Trade Secret Damages: The Federal Circuit just told lower courts they can’t just shut down unjust enrichment claims in trade secret disputes. This ruling fundamentally alters the landscape for IP litigation, giving plaintiffs more use.
